Tuesday, 4 July 2017

Mobile Money Business Models in Myanmar


Myanmar at a glance

The financial sector in Myanmar is small and underdeveloped. Foreign banks currently are not allowed to operate in Myanmar. Use of the informal providers of credit and transfer services in both urban and rural areas is widespread.


The market is therefore large enough to attract financial technology that could significantly improve outreach while contribution to innovation in the sector. The scope for the branchless banking seems limited to the lack of infrastructure and the high cost of capital investment.

The consumer behavior of Myanmar is different from others, so that home growth strategy would be the most effective and efficient business model as it’s awareness by ASEAN countries investor in these days.


The Issues in Myanmar


Ø  The lack of an educated workforce skilled in modern technology contributes to the growing problems of the economy. 

Ø  The country lacks adequate infrastructure such as transportation, electricity, data communication.

Ø  Energy shortages are common throughout the country including in Yangon and only 25% of the country's population has electricity.

Ø  The potential for branchless banking is limited because of the monopolistic and underdeveloped status from the regulation of the communication sector.

Ø  The people of Myanmar still believe in Cash is still king, they can feel it, touch it and see it.

Ø  The Local people see as cash in hand would be more flexible to spend and carry it.

Ø  Fake Currency note are penetrating and widespread in many areas.

Market Analyst 


Myanmar – mobile banking and mobile money market overview:
MNO-Led Model
Mobile Network Operator acts as de facto “bank”. This model
places most of the regulatory responsibility on the MNO.

            Bank-Led Model
Financial services offered from a bank to their account holders through a network of agents.

            Independent model
                      Independent companies that often times establish a joint collaboration with MNO or Bank to meet the consumer demand not currently being met.



Advantages

MNO-Led

Ø Brand recognition and trust
Ø Well-developed distribution market thought Top up channel
Ø Self-funded model
Ø Familiar market segments
Ø Extensive agent networks provide better access


Bank-Led

     Bank as a driver of the service
Ø Path to full financial inclusion and financial footprint
Ø Service linked to a bank account at financial institution (i.e.: interest rate on deposit)
Ø Real time settlement of transactions linked to bank account
Ø May use POS, mobile as device, agent model and new financial products
Ø Deposit insurance

Independent

Ø Interoperability
Ø Rapid Product development
Ø Flexible partner
Ø Clear Mission
Ø Potential revenue driver
Ø Lower cost than branches
Ø Agents: typically look like MNO-led model small mom and pops, pharmacies, etc.,
Ø Clients- linked to bank account at special accounts for users
Ø Accessing new markets (client segment and geographies)
Ø New revenue stream (bill pay, G2P, cross selling etc.
Ø Cost savings (compared to bank’s branches and ATMs)


Challenges

MNO-Led

     Lack of familiarity to financial services sector
Ø Regulatory barriers
Ø Heavy upfront short term profits
Ø AML/ ATF issues
Ø Heavy agent and end user capacity building costs
Ø Agents and end user training

Bank-Led

    Depending on regulation, typically will be lower value account
Ø Many bank are also doing this a competitive and reactive measure
Ø KYC and requirement   with high information
Ø More on the documentation


Independent

   Often requires a bank partner
Ø Lack of distribution network
Ø Funding
Ø Brand control and building trust
Ø May be completely new, unfamiliar client segment-training
Ø Managing customer experience
Ø Potential for increase in Fraud
Ø Maintaining active accounts



Source: BizModel_v01